Warning: Some spoilers.
The Lord of the Rings trilogy - awesome, even better, and truly epic and spectacular. I saw all three movies up on the big screen one last time yesterday, an event that started at 9:30 AM and went until 1:18 AM the next day. There is nothing available for one's home that can match a theatre in terms of quality of screen size, though Sound can be matched to the thundering, seat-vibrating bass pumped out by some of these movies.
This three movie showing used the extended footage editions of Fellowship and Two Towers, I have the FOTR extended version on DVD, but the TTT extended scenes I'd only read about. Both movies were wondrous on the big screen again, every time I watch them I sense increasingly more subtleties in the sound and scenes, and still wonder where I was when some of those scenes flashed by me. Paying adult price to see them both again was well worth it, for the TTT extended footage, and seeing both in a theatre in what might be the last time ever.
Then came Return of the King, and all of a sudden Peter Jackson revealed an entirely different nuance to his movies - a slightly depraved side of life in Middle Earth. We see the story of Deagol and Smeagol when Deagol finds the ring, and it drives Smeagol to strangle him. Fortunately, Andy Serkis played Smeagol and finally gets his face on screen, but a short while later I realized - Smeagol's face is modeled after Serkis' own, only the eyes and perhaps the upper skull don't precisely match. A nice but disturbing piece, it looked horribly out of place and was perhaps over-done in terms of the introductory scene set decor. But Serkis had to be put on screen, his contribution and committment to the role of Gollum was extreme, and the drain of having to do "the voice" to thousands of different reporters and PR shows can drive an actor to fear about getting future roles in anything other than that typecast.
Over the rest of the Return of the King show, I got a deep chill after some of the epic scenes. The battle of the Pelennor fields and defense of Minas Tirith was unbelievably well done, with scenes of the Rohirrim wading deep into the enemy, fey as they were. The challenge of Dernhelm (Eowyn) and Merry Brandybuck versus the Witch King of Angband was also something unbelievably good. The tense scenes when the Captains of the West go out to challenge the Black Gates and when Sam and Frodo are making their way across the plains of Mordor was also extremely well done - the Eye of Sauron actually pauses on Sam and Frodo for a few moments just as the Captains are waiting outside the gates.
The heroism of both Pippin and Merry, and their use as comedy relief is very refreshing, as is a spectacularly funny exchange between Eowyn and Eomer. Eomer notices Merry suited in the gear of the Rohirrim and overhears Eowyn telling Merry to go to the grinding tent to get his sword sharpened.
Eomer: You shouldn't lead him on like that.
Eowyn: Do you doubt his courage?
Eomer: I doubt not his courage. Only the length of his arm.
The audience roared on several occasions in ROTK, on many occasions in FOTR and TTT. The ending scenes were heartfelt and wondrous, with reunions, but there was a moment when the scene went dark just as the battle in front of the Black Gates and I burst out laughing - PJ sending the audience into plunging fear, thinking there may be nothing afterwards but end credits. The movie went on for another 20 minutes after that, at least. The Grey Havens scene was beautiful, with a short glimpse of the sea. I think the four hobbit actors were told then that they would never be together again, because they were all bawling their eyes out in the scene as Frodo left for the ship.
There was another very interesting moment - an exchange between Gandalf and Pippin. They were trapped in an area of Minas Tirith, with soldiers barring the gates while a troll thundered away at it with a massive metal hammer. Pippin begins to contemplate his mortality, thinking he is very close to his end, but Gandalf in a completely utter departure from Tolkien begins to describe what lies after death, describing the journey to the undying lands over the seas, and then the first sight of the wondrous lands where all races live together...
There is probably one day in your life worth spending in a theatre watching good movies - this was it for me. But like Tolkien points out throughout his books, all things end and wain, life is very short-lived, and all that matters is what you do in every "today" in your life. The Lord of the Rings trilogy of movies will now live on only as DVDs, console and computer games. It should produce sufficient interest for the remaining Tolkien family to give rights to PJ to shoot The Hobbit, which I would dearly like to see, but ten years from now all this will be forgotten. And there are a good many lessons in Lord of the Rings worth remembering throughout all the ages of this world, lessons on the value and necessity of massive expanses of forest and field and rich earth, lessons on the appreciation of wildlife, lessons on why the "Wonders of the world" are worthwhile and that we should continue building them as appropriate, with perhaps a focus more on worldly issues and not an Egyptian King's ego, though beyond questioning that might be.
I only got into Tolkien two or three years ago but it has latched on to me, I love the fiction, love how groundbreaking Tolkien's ideas were in his day, and love his zest for life evidenced in the books. It is far more than a story for nerds, or science fiction not worth taking more seriously than other sci-fi. The Trilogy day was worth it, ROTK is a 10 out of 10 recommendation.
What do you think?
Comments
Very true.
I though of that myself last night at the theatre and noticed in stark contrast to the sandy blonde "wheat hairs" that there were only two people of Indian origin, and a scant few Asians in the theatre. Then again - Tolkien was probably at complete unawares about the cultural divide of his works, and the fact that he wanted to create a mythology for Anglo-Saxons probably aided him in making it specific to us. Non-whites are the enemy in the book, the blacker you are the more evil you are, and that tone would clearly be perceived in people of all non A-S races.
Oh, and let's not forget the King of Men would rather make an alliance with dead Anglo-Saxons that scare the crap out of everyone, before they would seek to make peace with living Corsairs, Swertings, or the races of Near or Far Harad.
It's also clearly a reason why the fiction resonates with so many Anglo-Saxons who either know their own culture and history, or buy into the idea that they have no culture and can't really identify who they are. I just love the story, but if anything I would like to see it done by replacing the mythical races of the book with various cultures from around the world. For example, the Japanese Samurai culture shares many parallels with Elves, including their skill with bows, the Druidic beliefs of the Ninja. The peoples of Gondor ... I'm not too sure, perhaps the various groups of India? Or another of the peoples of the world that have a history of great stonework, Egyptians perhaps. The Rohirrim would likely be the Anglo Saxon Northern Europeans, they are the most closely correlated peoples to people in our own world history. The pukel men could be indigenous groups from around the world.
This may not compare favourably to LOTR with mythical creatures, but it would rather be a chance to celebrate the histories of other peoples of the world, real histories, rather than trying to create a history for Anglo Saxons that will never live up to Tolkien's personal wishes - we just have to accept that Viking invaders destroyed almost all of the spoken and written history of Anglo-Saxons (I blame Boris, personally).
how did Boris do this?
with RSS, RSS 2.0? Stylesheets? his mobile phone?
He is such a wizard!
This is Graham's blog, it jus
This is Graham's blog, it just happens to be on my site. So I blame him.
Unfortunately, my 1-900-BLAME-BORIS number is not yet operational. Perhaps when I get a VoIP phone...
New Line has not been shy
about exploiting PJ's trilogy. They do so to a degree which imho is off-putting. All these consecutively more extended DVD 'more costly' editions, all these stunts with special showings. Me, skeptical.
As this Ebert guy said re ROTK:
...That it falls a little shy of greatness is perhaps inevitable. The story is just a little too silly to carry the emotional weight of a masterpiece. It is a melancholy fact that while the visionaries of a generation ago, like Coppola with "Apocalypse Now," tried frankly to make films of great consequence, an equally ambitious director like Peter Jackson is aiming more for popular success. The epic fantasy has displaced real contemporary concerns, and audiences are much more interested in Middle Earth than in the world they inhabit.
ROTK is expected to become the second billion-dollar film after Titanic, ~$150M in the first week. Strange-to-say, Titanic's toll was reached after weeks of undimming attendances to the initial disbelief of studio dunderheads, who then ladles on a giganticly smarmy campaign when it became clear they couldn't keep uppity Cameron from his Oscar(tm).
ROTK otoh has openned on 7,100 screens in North America alone - one of the largest bows ever, with a calculated campaign which pretends innocently to highlight fan interest but is I think an utterly crass display of cynicism. **gag** Good thing PJ has some integrity.
Oh well, H.Potter.3 will save us from blockbusterism, surely.
PJ aiming for the fans and regular viewers.
I have to disagree with that sentiment after hearing of, and seeing, the extended Two Towers footage. The first movie had some departures but was otherwise a movie both able to appeal to Tolkien fans and general movie-goers. When I came out of the Two Towers I began to think PJ had taken the lower path towards bucks, sacrificing the story. Then I caught wind of the extended footage in the Two Towers and realized that PJ is making these movies for the fans, sparing absolutely no expense, and then cutting the movies down for the general public. ROTK is full of oddly arranged scenes that clearly have more footage to fit in between - the first trailer for Return of the King clearly shows that, with Merry offering his service to Theoden (not in the movie), Eomer crying over the death of Theoden, a very short scene of the Rohirrim crashing into the orc defenses that could be a lot longer, show the trouble of some groups being cut off because they crash too far in. There is a lot more of the Pellenor Fields battle that seems to be left out, as is the journey and the Pukel men - we see Aragorn and company trekking through a narrow path, which is clearly in the story, but see no tribal peoples leading them or meeting with them.
What I think Peter Jackson is doing in the trailers and movie is showing -parts- of the broader story to reassure fans going to see it in theatres that he has made the fuller story, and only cutting it down for the sake of the broad moviegoing audience, while the extended ROTK edition will be far more to the liking of fans. There is too much in ROTK that seems to be cut short to be simply omitted, after I look back to the huge gap between the Two Towers and its extended edition and see the same gaps visible enough in the theatrical version.
That said - the audience of today doesn't seem to care at all about movies with social commentary. Or care about grander issues at all.
Roger Ebert also claimed on his TV show that Gandalf looked like an old man but somehow could fight better, charge faster, and come off as stronger as the humans he fought along side of, so I don't take his opinion too seriously. He might be able to remark on the average movie with accuracy, being generic, but clearly there are few people who will get Tolkien without reading it, and from his comments it seems he didn't get it.
PJ is contractually bound
to delivery a showable theatrical cut, which means rating and length limits. The extended editions reveal the true intentions of his artistic conscience. Again it was Cameron who with The Abyss and then T2 first espoused this view as a filmaker, considered heretical at the time, that the vid version is the film directors' true cut. It's still not a politically-correct view and not all directors buy it, Tarantino doesn't, nor Scorcese.
Now that revenues from DVD is same or higher than theatrical grosses, the studios are happy to play along either way. They'll use commentary or documentary or a director's cut to differentiate the vid from the theatrical product.
The other thing which this led to is doing the vid transfer as part of a film's post-production cycle. It's nearly impossible to do an authoritative transfer once the key people have scattered to other projects.
For LOTR
For Lord of the Rings, I think Cameron's system works perfectly - theatrical cut for the general movie watcher, extended edition for the fans.
A friend remarked yesterday that he hated all the "Oh, here is what you need to know and why about topic X" scenes, but that is what actually happened in Lord of the Rings as well. It works perfectly for the general audience (though LOTR still really confused a lot of people), but for the extended cut for fans that stuff could be cut out if it wasn't part of the book, and other footage could be added in (more Pelennor battle, for example, which I sense there is a lot missing from the movie)
i think chances are...
there'll be lots more theatrical screenings of the trilogy, all three in extended editions.
I wasn't too bowled over by the first two. Definitely their extended editions are better, so I want to see the ROTK extended edition - not this theatrical cut which PJ admits is compromised.
One of the best things I've read in this mania:
...Miriam Kriss put down her book to explain that she was there in tribute to Peter Jackson, "a fan who understood." Then she delivered a rather stunning tribute to the fan aesthetic: "The problem with the last George Lucas `Star Wars' movies is that he's not a fan of his own work. You can't be if it's your work. But he doesn't understand anymore why we loved `Star Wars.' He just sits and stares at effects on his computers. I'd rather see `Star Wars' movies by people who grew up with `Star Wars.' A fan would get it."
I'm glad u liked ROTK since u luv the books, but I'm more curious to see Episode-3, if only to find out how the story goes, then put that thread of my life to bed after so many yrs.As a high-schooler reading Tolkien, something was amiss I felt removed while my buddies were transported, I now think that was because there's nothing asian in middle-earth. Nothing is asian on tatooine either, but neither was there a thick veneer of cultivated saxony - a barrier to us who grew up as unwilling colonials.